COURSE REQUIREMENTS + ELIGIBILITY (4.2 · NEW): engine-driven from coded D3 rules
COMPOSES: CourseRequirementsTableComponent · EligibilityExplainerComponent · badge-eligibility · sticky-cta

Everything below is derived from Scan::Eligibility.evaluate — the hero badge, the table cells and the "Am I eligible?" breakdown all trace to the same rules, so they can never disagree. Met = success chip, near-miss = warning chip (never red). The engine reports the honest 3 of 4 (the portfolio is an alternative, not a gate).

Coded requirements — engine output

Design and Technology — GCE A Level

Likely eligible

Entry requirements

From the scan’s coded rules — replaces today’s freetext paragraph.

Requirement
Rule
You
GCSE passes
≥ 6 at grade 5+
7 passes
English
Grade 5+
6
Maths
Grade 5+
5
Art (subject)
Grade 6+
5 · near miss
Alternative route
Portfolio may substitute
Verified 16 Jul 2026 Source

a11y: near-miss chip uses tw:text-yellow-900 (7.59:1 AA) — DS default badge-warning-subtle is 3.34:1 and is flagged for a token fix.

Am I eligible?

Likely eligible
3 of 4 met

Just one to go — Art needs Grade 6+. Predicted 5, one grade short — a strong application is well worth it. Or apply with a portfolio instead.

Fallback — no coded rules published

The same engine returns :unknown for courses with no coded rules — freetext + an -unknown badge that routes to Enquire, never a fabricated verdict.

Fine Art — GCE A Level

Requirements not published

Entry Requirements

This provider hasn’t published structured entry requirements for this course yet. Enquire and the school will confirm what they look for.